Islamic Just War Pacifism


What is that faith which is spoken of in Islam and referred to throughout the Qur’an, as an axis around which all questions revolve? It refers to faith in God in the first place. In the second place, it connotes faith in angels, holy books, prophets, Resurrection, etc. In Islam, is faith a goal for mankind or a means for other goals? In discussing Islam as a school of thought, it must be clarified whether faith is a goal and a blessing, irrespective of its effect. We speak of effects of faith and say it gives tranquility and fortitude against calamities, and in a society the people can trust one another, and show benevolence and avoid malevolence. But is faith good because of its effects, or because it seeks perfection in itself?

What is that faith which is spoken of in Islam and referred to throughout the

Qur’an, as an axis around which all questions revolve? It refers to faith in God

in the first place. In the second place, it connotes faith in angels, holy

books, prophets, Resurrection, etc. In Islam, is faith a goal for mankind or a

means for other goals?

All these are goals for man, for no divine goals or means are involved. These

goals are meant as human accomplishments towards perfection.

Is faith itself a human perfection which has been recommended to him? Or has man

been called upon to have faith because of its good effects? Philosophers put

this question like this: “Is faith a blessing for man, or something useful?”

There is a difference between a blessing and being useful. A blessing is in

itself a perfection desired for itself, not for something else. But anything

useful is good because of its beneficial effect. It is a prologue to a blessing,

but not a blessing in itself.

In discussing Islam as a school of thought, it must be clarified whether faith

is a goal and a blessing, irrespective of its effect. We speak of effects of

faith and say it gives tranquility and fortitude against calamities, and in a

society the people can trust one another, and show benevolence and avoid


But is faith good because of its effects, or because it seeks perfection in

itself? Here comes the question: What does human perfection consist of? This is

more difficult to answer than the perfection of other matters. In the world we

can often distinguish perfection of things. We can say how a perfect apple

should be; it refers to its flavor, color, delicacy and shape, and if an apple

has these qualities we call it perfect.

A perfect house can easily be defined, so can a horse. But it is most difficult

to define a perfect human being. Therefore various views concerning him must be

studied to see which is right, or if we cannot do so scientifically, at least we

should see how and to what extent such views are confirmed by the Qur’an.

Can it be said that a perfect being is he who gets maximum benefit from nature

which is external to him? But this is wrong for two reasons: Firstly we do not

define other things in this way. We do not say a horse is perfect merely because

it gets the highest benefit. We should consider its own particular qualities and

assets. We do not think a horse perfect because of eating a large quantity of

fodder. Nor do we call an apple perfect because of its getting more air, water

and light.

Secondly, it is hard to conscientiously agree that the most perfect man is one

who benefits most from nature For it implies that a defective man is he who

benefits less or least!

Let us compare two human beings: Muawiyah enjoyed maximum benefits in his eighty

years of life. He was ruler of Syria for forty years (Twenty years as a powerful

governor, and another twenty as a powerful Caliph).

Then there was Ali (a) who lived an ascetic life, with a philosophy for it,

whether this philosophy was to be free, or generous or humane, or not to be

taken in by the world, but to give his heart to spiritual things, Whatever it

was, his share of this world’s gifts was a few loaves of bread, Should we then

call him imperfect on account of his benefiting least from the world?

If we say this, we are making out man to be less than an animal, for, we do not

evaluate any animal by the standard of its benefiting from the world, even

though some people have no other thought but this in evaluating human beings.

But there is no one who believes this to the extent of negating every


Here another point comes up, that is, if such benefiting is not human perfection

in this world, what about the next one? This would mean the perfection of man is

to deserve and benefit from God’s gifts. However, this is not possible in its

utmost measure in this world, so people pray for securing maximum benefit in the

next world. In speaking of such worship, Ibn Sina (Avicenna) says; “For such men

worship is like working for which a wage is expected so that, without that wage,

there would be no willingness to work.”

From the viewpoint of Islamic logic, such a belief would mean a deficient kind

of worship, to show devotion and worship only in order to be rewarded in heaven,

There are many references to this by the Imams (a) such as this: “Those who

worship for fear, act like slaves fearing their master.” Similar are the words

of Ali [The Nahjul Balaghah, Wisdom 229: “Some worship God for the sake of their

desires, and that is merchants’ worship; some worship for fear, and that is

slaves’ worship; and some worship out of gratitude and that is the worship of

the noble.”]

Again, in another saying, Ali (a) is even more explicit: “O God, I do not

worship you for fear of your Fire or for cupidity in desiring heaven; I worship

you because you are worthy of it.”

Therefore, it is not right to think of human perfection as the ability to secure

maximum material benefits, even by negating every virtue in this world, or to

postpone such benefits to future life. There are various materialistic views all

of which end with the idea of benefit, Spiritual views are of the following


1) The first and perhaps the most important is the view of the gnostics

concerning “Perfect Man.”

Their view is derived from various religions They are inspired by ideas, such as

‘Adam’, ‘Prophets’, ‘Saints’ and the ‘Perfect Man’ like the “awaited Mahdi” .

Mackinion has written a book entitled “Perfect Man in Islam” which has been

translated into Arabic by Abdur Rahman Badawi, In it he says: “The theory of

perfect man is not a Hellenic bequest, for, Greek philosophy has said nothing of


In the Islamic world this topic has been presented by the Sufis, and especially

by Mohuyuddin Arabi. There are similar books by Abdo-Karim Deylami, Aziz-el-Din

Nasafi, and a Sufi poet called Sayed Muhammad Borgheti. The gnostics have a

clear view about man’s perfection and a perfect man, which may not be wholly

acceptable to others, but they offer it with a decisive finality.

They believe that there is one truth and that is God. They consider other things

shadows of the truth. In their opinion everything is an attribute of God. If we

die without recognizing the truth we would have died in infidelity, ignorance,

darkness and absolute unawareness.

A man is perfect when he understands the truth and attains it. They think it

impossible for God to appear in man or be allied to him. For them incarnation is

dualism, so attaining the truth or God, means losing one’s identity in Him, and

that is when man understands the whole truth, and then he will know himself. God

is the only truth and everything else is its manifestation, This is somewhat

similar to the phrase of ‘approaching God, except that they believe in phases of

proximity, subject to a definite order. So, there are stages of gnosticism

before truth is attained, One who does not attain it is imperfect, and man’s

humanity consists of knowing and attaining truth.

What helps this advance towards God and truth are love, affection and

familiarity. The way to Him is through the heart, not the mind or philosophy

Every other perfection is derived from this perfection, and for that reason

alone it may be considered perfection. Is asceticism perfection? They will say,

yes, because it is a condition for following this path. So are humility and

other qualities like assistance, and guidance which are moral goodness.

2) Divine philosophers have a view different from that of the gnostics. They

think human perfection depends on two things:

(i) recognition of facts, or wisdom. Gnostics emphasize truth, but the

philosophers attach importance to wisdom, which for them is understanding the

reality of things and existence as they are, generally but not to wisdom. For

example, the properties of an apple are related to science, not to wisdom.

Similarly knowing a city or a house as a whole unit, is different from knowing

parts of it.

A sage considers human perfection is the general context of proper and

scientific recognition of the universe. His subjective world is a scientific and

intellectual one which corresponds with the objective world. For example in an

objective world there is God, and His Universal Order, material, and immaterial.

In the scientific and intellectual world, too, these things must exist.

For them, then, a perfect human being must recognize wisdom. We may discuss the

proof and evidence of wisdom, but we cannot discuss its origin and principle,

The Qur’an, too says in (2:269): “The blessing of wisdom may be granted to

anyone who He wishes, and he who received it, found much goodness.”

(ii) Beside wisdom, as a requisite of perfection, a sage also considers justice

as a requisite, that is, moral justice on which social justice depends. This

means that there should be an equilibrium between human powers and instincts

ruled over by his intellectual power. In other words, the intellect must

dominate all appetites, passions and imagination, so that each of these powers

should be given the moderate share it deserves. In the terminology of a sage

what is related to wisdom is called speculative intellect, and what is related

to justice is a named practical intellect.

The question that was about ‘faith’ may be repeated in connection with wisdom,

Does wisdom represent to a man an end or means? And is knowledge an end in

itself or means, or both?

Is knowledge human perfection? If it is, then it involves benefits, and without

benefits it is useless, and the more it benefits, the better it is.

3) A third view is that human perfection lies in sentiments, that is, love. This

is an ethical viewpoint that claims that a man who has more affection for others

is perfect, and if he shows little affection to others he is imperfect, The

basis of moral depravity is selfishness; the more one abandons selfishness and

shows love for others, the more perfect he is. This is a point emphasised also

by Hindus. Gandhi insists thoroughly on this point in his book “This is my Faith

. ” Hindus emphasize both truth and love, and criticize western civilization

which has negated these two things.

4) Another view is that human perfection is beauty. This, of course, does not

refer only to physical beauty, but mainly to spiritual beauty. Artistic things

show an artistic spirit which creates beautiful things.

5) Another view which may be called a prevalent western one is materialistic,

and holds that human perfection lies in power. The more powerful a man is and

the more dominating over his environment and other beings, the more perfect he

is. Darwin’s Theory of Evolution reflects this idea. According to Darwin’s

criteria, a more perfect being must be powerful enough to preserve himself and

remove his rival in the struggle for survival. Darwin is criticized for having

annihilated morality by his survival principle. Some Westerners claim to have

discovered that knowledge is what benefits mankind, makes him more powerful, and

prevails over nature. Thus they promoted empirical science, to be used as an

instrument of developing civilization and technology .

This idea had its uses, but they went to such excess that it caused more damage

than benefit. They ignored the sacredness of wisdom, truth, love and faith in

which men had believed before. To them, everything became subordinate to power,

and so they tried to change the course of human advancement. Since then, mankind

tends to be devoid of faith in any spirituality, and if they claim spirituality

they act in a contrary manner.

Nietzche’ s philosophy, has been criticized for being too extravagant . In any

case he has been frank and outspoken. The logical conclusion of his (and of the

intellectual path Bacon and others have followed) is to place science in the

service of power, and to recognize human perfection only in power.

Summing up Islamic Monotheism

Now let us see what Islam thinks about these views . Does Islam agree with the

question of ‘truth’ as being perfection? We cannot wholly accept the gnostic

view. For Islam God is not a Creator in the sense of a father – like being

capable of procreating other beings. If so, what is He after accomplishing the

task of creation? Is He like a father who has children, or a mere provider of

livelihood to creatures, or according to Aristotle, the first motive power?

Islam’s logic about God is much higher than that There is nothing that can be

compared with Him. If he is ‘Reality’, then other things are a “mirage”, or a

‘shadow’. The Qur’an says (24;35): “God is the light of heaven and the earth…”

It means, He is what He is, and other things, too, are attributable to Him.

Other references to God in the Qur’an show that He is ‘absolute truth.’ Again

the Qur’an says (41:53): “We will soon show them our signs in the world and in

their minds to assure them that the Qur’an is true.”

In fact, when someone has faith in God, everything else is reduced to nothing

for him, for, he has found something compared with which other things are

worthless, Sa’di has expressed this idea beautifully in his poetic work; ‘Boostan’:

“The way of intellect is a maze; but, for the wise there is nothing but God .”

And to explain the matter of nothingness, he says: “This can be told to a

discerner of truth, but men of conjecture will cavil at it, Saying, what, then,

are heaven and earth? Who are human beings, beasts and demons?”

He, then, answers his questions and says they are not mutually incompatible:

“You, my wise friend, have asked well, and I will answer to your intellect’s

approval; That the sun, sea, mountain and firmaments, human beings, demons,

jinn, and angels, Whatever they may be, they are too inferior to speak of

existence, before His Essence.”

If He is, other things are nothing. It is impossible to turn to another pole

once a man knows God, or to assume anything as a goal. Thus, faith in Islam is

higher than any possibility of comparison with any other maker but God, a truth

and reality before which nothing may be considered true and real.

But is wisdom, which is claimed by a sage, of importance in Islam? The principle

of wisdom, that is, recognition of facts as they are, is acceptable in Islam.

The Qur’an says (2:269): “He will grant the blessing of wisdom to anyone He

wishes, and he who found it, received much goodness.” How can we interpret this

verse? Wisdom is called a human blessing, and is almost the equivalent of

perfection, and not only something useful.

Justice, too, is similar, that is, social justice, Of course social justice is

related to the perfection of individuals concerning moral justice. Islam

believes in moderation with respect to powers and instincts, and rejects

extravagance. It does not consider the rule of intellect alone adequate, should

also be faith, Islam regards human power to philosophize as too weak to be a

ruler of man, philosophy combined with faith can act as a governor.

But concerning ‘love’ in Islam, what more can be said than the following In a

chapter of traditions entitled “Kindnesses and Mutual Affections”, the Prophet

(s) asks his companions: “What handle of faith is stronger?” Each of them gives

a different answer, One says ‘prayer’, another says ‘fasting’ or ‘pilgrimage’,

etc. He says: “What you said is true, but none of them is the strongest,” They

ask: “What is it then?” He answers: “Loving others for the sake of God . “

Which of the above beliefs are of first importance, and which are secondary?

There is also the question of ‘worship’. The Qur’an says (51: 56): “I did not

create angels and human beings except to worship me,” So, worship is presented

as an objective. There may, of course, be some who do not believe in this. We

have already discussed the view that upholds material benefits, involving the

negation of human perfection and existence of perfect beings. They consider

everything, including knowledge, useful to the extent of benefiting mankind.

This has been the course of human thought since Bacon. Today that the claim is

made that society has advanced and evolved, which society is more perfect? Is it

the one which is nearer reality or faith? Or the one which has attained more

wisdom and justice or love? They say: “No, it is a society that can secure more

benefits, more techniques, and more science, all of which have provided mankind

with better living and greater material benefits.”

This greater benefit, as they see it, is no more than what is enjoyed by animals

and plants to the extent of safeguarding bodily health and growth, and catering

to lusts and appetites.

Thus according to them, there is no human perfection beyond animal and vegetable

perfection. Science, too, is for man like a horn for an animal, that is, a

weapon for survival.

Now let us consider worship. What is worship for? There are two ways of looking

at it. For ordinary people worship is for obtaining a better reward from God in

the next world. The rewards of this world are limited, so, worship gives the

hope for deeper and greater compensation in after life, including houris,

heavenly palaces, honey, delicious fruits and drinks!

But this is no more than animal perfection, even though it implies a lasting

life hereafter.

But worship may have another meaning, It is not the worship of a slave, but of

the free and noble. In the latter kind of worship securing benefits is never the

objective, nor is it deliverance from physical and material sufferings. It is

far above animal appetites, It is worship for the sake of love, affection and

gratitude. It is then that worship finds a meaning equivalent to the love of

truth, and God is then not considered as a means of life in this or the next

world. God will, then, be truth itself and the true objective .

This type of worship assumes a lofty position, since it is not a means, but an

end in itself.

Thus, there are different stages of worship: worship for satisfying animal

desires in the next world is a kind of perfection in comparison with absence of

worship and a positive attachment to material things. For, it means seeking from

God something permanent, as against the transient selfishness and sensuality in

this world.

But this worship is much inferior to the exalted and pure worship which is done

for its own sake. So worship depends on faith and faith depends on truth. Islam

has invited people to wisdom, justice, love and beauty.

But which of them is the main goal? Are they equally significant? Or is one of

them the principal objective and the others subordinate to it?

We think that the goal is truth, that is, God. Islamic monotheism can only have

this meaning. If Islam offers other goals such as heaven, or escape from hell,

they are of secondary importance. Wisdom by itself is not a goal, but as a means

of attaining truth. Justice, too, is good in checking the animality of human

spirit and removing artificial barriers in the way of truth. Love, too, in its

effect helps to attain truth. There remains faith, which may be claimed as a

goal in Islam. But is faith important because of its effects in removing

anxiety, checking aggression, and creating mutual trust? Faith in God is by

itself a goal. The effects of faith which are so numerous make it the link of

man with God, and such a link is perfection from the viewpoint of Islam.

Selected Chapters from;

Goal of
Life by Shaheed Ayatullah Murtadha Mutahhari

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *