ForeignPolicy/Pentagon Says It Hit Its Target, but Did It Kill al-Shabab’s Leader?

Shafaqna – Gordon Lubold , Kate Brannen, Foreign Policy: U.S. officials are assessing whether an airstrike in Somalia killed the leader of the al-Shabab terrorist group, a potentially significant blow to the al Qaeda affiliate responsible for a wave of bloody attacks across Africa.

The officials confirmed Tuesday, Sept. 2, that the target of Monday’s attack was Ahmed Abdi Godane, al-Shabab’s leader, but said the Pentagon is still assessing whether Godane had actually been killed. The United States and close allies like Israel have previously touted the killings of other top militants, only to later discover that the targets had escaped unscathed.

U.S. special operations forces, “working from actionable intelligence” and using manned and unmanned aircraft, along with Hellfire missiles and laser-guided munitions, destroyed an encampment and a vehicle in south central Somalia, the Pentagon’s press secretary, Rear Adm. John Kirby, told reporters in a briefing at the Pentagon. No U.S. troops were on the ground in Somalia before or after the strike, he added.

“We certainly believe that we hit what we were aiming at,” Kirby said, but cautioned that he “wouldn’t get into assessing the effectiveness right now.”

Abu Mohammed, an al-Shabab commander and spokesman, told the Associated Press that Godane was in one of two vehicles hit by the strikes, but would not say whether he was one of six militants killed.

If Godane was killed, it could represent a significant blow to al-Shabab, the al Qaeda-affiliated group that has contributed to Somalia’s destabilization and is responsible for a number of high-profile attacks throughout Africa.

“I think [Godane] put the organization in a very vulnerable position,” said Hussein Mahmoud Sheikh-Ali, the senior counterterrorism advisor to Somalia’s president, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, in remarks at the Atlantic Council on Tuesday. “If he’s killed, it’s going to be a game-changer.”

The airstrike comes as U.S. President Barack Obama and his aides deliberate over whether to ratchet up the U.S. air campaign against the Islamic State, a militant group that controls broad swaths of Syria and Iraq. The White House has been open about its deep reluctance to get too heavily involved in the fight against the militants, largely to avoid getting enmeshed in a potentially open-ended conflict with the extremists. U.S. intelligence officials say they don’t know the location of the Islamic State’s shadowy leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

In Somalia, by contrast, U.S. forces have long worked closely with Somali and other African forces to rout out al-Shabab, which has battled the country’s weak central government and has carried out deadly strikes outside the country’s borders, such as the September 2013 attack at Kenya’s Westgate mall that killed at least 67 people.

Washington’s African allies have shared reasonably reliable intelligence gleaned from their ground forces, and U.S. drones have freedom of movement over much of the continent. Commanders within the Joint Special Operations Command in Tampa, Florida, can typically act quickly if intelligence dictates they have the chance to take out a high-value target.

The administration has been targeting top al-Shabab leaders, with mixed results, for years. In January, a U.S. missile strike killed Sahal Iskudhuq, one of the group’s commanders, who was believed to be close to Godane. And last October, a U.S. drone strike took out the group’s top explosives expert. But a raid earlier that month by a team of Navy SEALs was abandoned when the commandos realized they wouldn’t be able to capture their intended target, a Kenyan member of the group who goes by the name Ikrima.

In his briefing on Tuesday, Kirby stressed that the al-Shabab network, which the State Department designated a foreign terrorist organization in 2008, posed a serious and ongoing threat to the West.

“They’ve also continued to plan plots targeting Westerners, including U.S. personnel in East Africa,” he said. “This action was taken because of the history of terrorist attacks and violence that this organization is responsible for and continues to be responsible for.”

Various media reports indicated that the site of the airstrike was near Barawe, a focus of the ongoing efforts against al-Shabab. The United States would not likely send American personnel on the ground to the site of the operation to determine whether Godane was killed, so it could take some time before Washington can confirm if the mission targeting the al-Shabab leader was successful. Still, U.S. officials seemed reasonably optimistic as they characterized the impact of the mission, an indication that the terrorist group leader has been killed.

Ever since al-Shabab’s stunning attack at the Westgate mall, which signaled a comeback of sorts for a terrorist group that U.S. officials said was largely vanquished, the United States has quietly ramped up its financial, logistical, and material backing to the African Union Mission in Somalia, (AMISOM), as well as Somali national security forces. A small team of U.S. military advisors is on the ground to help train the AMISOM and Somali forces. American drones from nearby Camp Lemonnier, a sprawling base that the United States maintains in Djibouti, have also been providing intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance to the African forces.

“The result has been a rather successful (if slow and grinding) campaign prosecuted by AMISOM and the Somalis against al Shabaab,” Roger Carstens, a former Special Forces officer who spent more than a year on the ground in Somalia in the last few years, told Foreign Policy in an email. But though the United States hasn’t conducted many airstrikes in Somalia in recent years, Carstens said it’s clear it will act when the time is right.

“As can be shown by the rather small number of U.S. military operations in Somalia over the past few years, the standard for an attack in Somalia has been pretty high,” Carstens wrote in the email. “The target must be worthy of the U.S. stepping out from its preferred position (behind the scenes) to conduct a unilateral strike.”

Carstens noted that if the operation in fact had occurred in Barawe, that area is still a “pretty tough neighborhood” and, therefore, American commanders may have wanted to rely more heavily on indigenous forces instead of putting U.S. special operations forces on the ground and thus exposing them to considerable risk.

The memory of the 1993 downing of two American Black Hawk helicopters during a raid in October of that year that resulted in the deaths of 18 American servicemen still weighs heavily on U.S. policy in Somalia and contributes to Washington’s risk-averse approach there.

Potential questions may arise about whether the United States had authorization from the Somali government to carry out the strike. But Sheikh-Ali, the counterterrorism aide to the Somali president, said the United States and Somalia maintain by “broad agreement” a list of targeted individuals whom the Somali government believes are “irreconcilables” who are unwilling to negotiate with Mogadishu and can therefore be targeted.

Peter Pham, director of the Africa Center at the Atlantic Council, said the United States seemingly has increased its role in Somalia as it strengthens its capabilities with AMISOM and local forces.

“I would put the apparent increase in U.S. operational tempo in Somalia as a function of both better intelligence and a change in al-Shabaab itself,” Pham wrote FP in an email late Monday. “The first is the result of an increased presence, both public and clandestine, that has resulted in information that can be operationalized,” he wrote.

The second shift is within al-Shabab after it “abandoned Mogadishu” in 2011 and became more focused on terrorism, rather than insurgence, and began to pose a greater threat to the United States and its allies, Pham said.

But on Tuesday, it was clear the United States was much more heavily engaged in Somalia than had been known publicly before. And Sheikh-Ali, eager for international support to continue, said the possibility that Godane has been killed shouldn’t send a message to the United States and others that Somalia doesn’t still need help.

“They are not naive enough to think” that the problem ends with the possible elimination of the terrorist organization’s top leader, he said.

“I hope not, but I don’t know,” he said.


0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *